sdecoret - stock.adobe.com
Most HIEs routinely use HL7 v2 and CDA health data standards
While the use of health data standards like HL7 v2 and CDA are popular across HIE organizations, adoption of HL7 FHIR APIs lags, a national survey found.
Health information exchange organizations are adopting health data standards at varying rates, with a recent data brief from the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy and ONC (ASTP/ONC) revealing widespread use of HL7 v2 and CDA standards but slower adoption of FHIR APIs.
There are two main kinds of health data standards:
- Content standards, like HL7 v2 and CDA, describe the structure and organization of the data.
- Terminology standards like LOINC communicate health concepts through a common set of codes, terms and classifications.
Content standards
In a 2023 national survey of HIEs, more than 90% of HIEs reported that they routinely or sometimes received and sent (or made available) CDAs.
Additionally, most HIEs routinely received and sent (or made available) HL7 v2 messages.
The survey also found that 96% of HIEs reported receiving HL7 v2 ADT messages. The high percentage of HIEs receiving HL7 v2 ADT messages could be partly explained by the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access final rule's requirement for the electronic exchange of patient ADT data for psychiatric hospitals, critical access hospitals and Medicare Conditions of Participation.
Only a small amount of HIEs reported routinely using HL7 FHIR APIs to receive and send data (or make data available).
Terminology standards
The survey asked which data elements HIEs made available to participating organizations. On average, HIEs reported making more than two-thirds of data elements from each version of USCDI available to participating organizations.
The data elements with the highest rate of availability to participating organizations are immunizations (92%), problems (90%), vital signs (90%) and encounters (90%).
About 4 in 10 HIEs routinely sent data (or made data available) that adhere to USCDI v1 or v2, and 33% routinely received data from their participants that adhere to USCDI v1 or v2.
However, about 30% of HIEs reported not knowing if the information they received or sent (or made available) adhered to USCDI's semantic standards requirements, showing a lack of awareness and use of USCDI.
LOINC adoption
Beyond the general exchange of health data, data standards are critical for laboratory data interoperability. The Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) data standard provides a consistent naming convention for the exchange of laboratory results across electronic health information systems.
Almost half (46%) of HIEs reported mapping from nonstandard laboratory test or result codes to LOINC codes, suggesting that many HIEs might be encountering the use of local codes by laboratories. Most HIEs that mapped local codes to LOINC codes mapped all, most or some nonstandard laboratory test or result codes to LOINC codes within the past year.
However, some HIEs reported a lack of resources and expertise to map local codes to LOINC. Other HIEs indicated that LOINC tools were too difficult to use. The authors emphasized the need to support laboratories in LOINC adoption to reduce the need for HIEs to map from local codes to LOINC.
Hannah Nelson has been covering news related to health information technology and health data interoperability since 2020.